Abstract:
Conflict resolution in Ghana has taken centre stage in the last decade with efforts geared towards developing alternative and acceptable mechanisms for dealing with the country’s numerous conflicts. One of such mechanisms that have been given prominence is the Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanism (ADR). This research was set out to investigate the effectiveness of the Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Alavanyo-Nkonya conflict case in the Volta region of Ghana. The aim of the research was to ascertain reasons for the use of ADR in this protracted conflict, to investigate the structures adopted under the mechanism for the peace process and finally, to examine the strengths and weaknesses of the method. The research heavily relied on interviews as a data collection instrument. In all twenty interviews were conducted among members of the peace mediation committee, consultative committee as well as members and leaders from the two communities. The research revealed that the method of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) was preferred by the people of the two communities compared to the modern legal methods owing to the delays and judgmental posture of the legal methods. Again the research revealed that the people of the two communities were willing and prepared to negotiate and chart their own peace process hence the use of the method (ADR). The research equally revealed that the method has a large involvement of the people from the two communities and the decisions and outcomes were seen as a reflection of the decisions of the two communities. This makes the method have the buy- in of the two communities. The research therefore recommends that there should be more vigorous education on the importance of Alternative Disputes Resolution in Ghana. This can be done through the Chief’s courts promoting the method and through the District and Municipal assemblies also promoting the use of ADR in solving disputes.
