University of Cape Coast Institutional Repository

What Coaches Can Learn from Athlete Perceptions

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mintah, Joseph Kwame
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-08T17:01:51Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-08T17:01:51Z
dc.date.issued 2013-01
dc.identifier.issn 23105496
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/7765
dc.description 3p:, ill. en_US
dc.description.abstract Competitive athletes attribute their successes and failures to factors such as ability, effort, task difficulty, and luck. Research shows that the type of attribution athletes use to define outcomes affects both motivation and performance: It is therefore important for coaches to fully understand the attribution process. Heider <1944) categorized behavioral outcomes into effective personal force (ability and effort> and effective environmental force <task difficulty and luck>. Based on his theory the four attributions of ability, effort, task difficulty, and luck influence future success and failure. In 1972, Weiner restructured Heider's four attributions into a two-dimensional framework he called locus of causality. Locus of causality has two components: stability and locus of control. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Cape Coast en_US
dc.title What Coaches Can Learn from Athlete Perceptions en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UCC IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account