| dc.description.abstract | 
The study focused on investigating knowledge on validity and reliability of
classroom assessment among SHS teachers in Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolitan 
Assembly. This study adopted the descriptive survey design. A sample of 278 
was selected for the study through stratified random sampling technique. 
Questionnaire and observation checklist were designed for collecting data for 
the present investigation. Data were analysed using frequencies and 
percentages, means and standard deviations, one-way MANOVA, content 
analysis, and simultaneous multiple linear regression analysis. It was found that 
majority of the respondents possessed high knowledge on validity and 
reliability. It was also revealed that the respondents did not engage in several 
practices that enhance validity and reliability of assessment, however, they 
mostly engaged in only a few. The results further showed no statistically 
significant gender difference in knowledge on validity and knowledge on 
reliability. With respect to years of teaching, there was a statistically significant 
difference in knowledge on validity, however, no statistically significant 
difference in teachers’ knowledge on reliability. Finally, it was revealed that 
both knowledge in validity and reliability were positive predictors of adherence 
to practices that enhance validity in assessment. It was concluded that the 
soundness of the interpretations and uses of the end of semester results of the 
schools in this study for certain purposes are questionable. It was recommended 
that the Metropolitan Directorate of Education, STMA, continues to intensify 
their workshops for teachers, particularly in the area of assessment. | 
en_US |