Abstract:
ABSTRACT
The study determined the socioeconomic implications of the closed season
policy on artisanal fisherfolk in Ghana using Elmina and Apam fishing
communities as a case study. The mixed-method design was used in the data
collection. Stratified random sampling of households was used to select 268
respondents made up of canoe fishers, fish processors and traders from the two
most vibrant fishing communities in Central Region of Ghana. A Semi-
structured interview schedule, focused group discussion and key informant
interviews were used to solicit information from the respondents. The results
showed that all fisherfolk (100%) knew about the closed season policy,
however, 47% of them did not know the purpose of the closure. Despite the
differences in their perception, most fisherfolk were unsure of the policy's
success in their fishing activities. No statistically significant differences were
found between fisherfolks’ perception and socio-demographic characteristics
like age, level of education, main livelihood and years in livelihood; except
among studied communities. The policy had an overall negative effect on
fisherfolks’ income and livelihood. As majority of fisherfolk lost a reasonable
amount of money of about $199, the policy also led to high unemployment,
increased hunger and malnutrition, increased school drop-out, theft and
prostitution among fishing households and communities during the closure.
14% of these fisherfolk had other income-generating livelihoods, while, 21% of
fisherfolk rely on their savings as a coping strategy during closure. For effective
compliance, MOFAD should ensure that the purpose of the closure is
disseminated to all individuals along the fisheries value chain mainly via radio
announcement.
