Refugee-host interaction: Case of Krisan refugee settlement in Ghana

Abstract

Views on host-refugee interactions are as varied as the activities of refugees. Some studies consider the outcomes of these interactions as symbiotic. To some, host populations take advantage of the vulnerable situation of refugees and exploit them. Yet others consider refugees as the beneficiaries because of having humanitarian assistance. This study assessed the nature of interactions between refugees of the Krisan Refugee Settlement in Ghana and the host population (Sanzule, Krisan and Eikwe communities) and the effects of such interactions on both populations. Probability and non-probability methods were used to select and collect data from 180 respondents each from the host population and the refugees. Four opinion leaders from the host communities and five representatives of UNHCR and its partners were also interviewed. Binomial logistic regression model was used to analyse the determinants of change of goals of refugees and refugees earning additional income. The study observed that the indigenes had mixed perceptions of refugee behaviour. Some had positive perception about refugee behaviour indicating that refugees were friendly while others had negative perception of refugees based on the view that they were environmental degraders. Both populations indicated that interactions were symbiotic. But refugees' relationship with camp administration was rather not healthy with refugees citing misunderstanding over resettlement and general abuse of refugee rights as the reasons for this unhealthy relationship. The Ghana Refugee Board needs to involve all stakeholders in decision making. This could be done through education and the institution of periodic meeting for stakeholders.