| dc.description.abstract | The study examines the burdens and outcomes that elections impose on Sub
Saharan African (SSA) countries. Conspicuously missing in the literature is 
the extent to which the level of development and literacy moderate the effect 
of election on government expenditure; and complexity of ballot paper and 
marginality on the proportion of invalid vote in SSA. Using macrodata from 
the World Bank and other sources, the study employed the System 
Generalised Method of Moment (GMM), Fixed Effect, Random Effect, and 
Hausman-Taylor (HT) models to test the hypotheses. We find statistical 
evidence to support the claim that level of development and literacy moderate 
the effect of election on government expenditure; and complexity of ballot 
paper and marginality on rejected ballots. The study recommends that 
governments of SSA countries must initiate policies that ensure strong fiscal 
discipline during electoral and non-electoral years. In addition, governments, 
candidates, political parties and other civil society organisations must intensify 
civic education to reduce the rate of rejected ballots in SSA | en_US |