dc.contributor.author | Kwadzo, Moses | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-11T09:21:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-11T09:21:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-07-09 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 23105496 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4294 | |
dc.description | 16p:, ill. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | A comparative analysis of different poverty measures, particularly across studies that use different conceptualizations and measurements of poverty, is very valuable. In highlighting this fact, this article compares three poverty measurements: monetary poverty, social exclusion, and capability poverty measurements. The results indicate that all three poverty measurements classify varied proportions of the U.S. population as poor. These variations occur as a function of the conceptualization and measurement of poverty. In general, all three poverty measurements are inadequate indicators of well-being. It is reasonable to suggest that researchers report results using more than one poverty measurement | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Cape Coast | en_US |
dc.subject | Social exclusion poverty | en_US |
dc.subject | Monetary poverty | en_US |
dc.subject | Capability poverty | en_US |
dc.subject | Measurement of poverty | en_US |
dc.subject | Conceptualization of poverty | en_US |
dc.title | Choosing concepts and measurements of poverty: a comparison of three major poverty approaches | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |