University of Cape Coast Institutional Repository

Genomic prediction of tropical maize resistance to fall armyworm and weevils: genomic selection should focus on effective training set determination

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author T. Odong, A. Badji
dc.contributor.author Machida, L.
dc.contributor.author Kwemoi, D. B.
dc.contributor.author Kumi, F.
dc.contributor.author Okii, D
dc.contributor.author Mwila, N.
dc.contributor.author Agbahoungba, S.
dc.contributor.author Ibanda, A.
dc.contributor.author Bararyenya, A.
dc.contributor.author Nghituwamhata, S. N.
dc.contributor.author Odong, T
dc.contributor.author Wasswa, P
dc.contributor.author Otim, M
dc.contributor.author Ochwo-Ssemakula, M.
dc.contributor.author H. Talwana, H.
dc.contributor.author G. Asea, G. Asea
dc.contributor.author Kyamanywa, S.
dc.contributor.author Rubaihayo, P.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-02-23T09:39:26Z
dc.date.available 2021-02-23T09:39:26Z
dc.date.issued 2020-07
dc.identifier.issn 23105496
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4725
dc.description 26p:, ill. en_US
dc.description.abstract Genomic selection (GS) can accelerate variety release by shortening variety development phase when factors that influence prediction accuracies (PA) of genomic prediction (GP) models such as training set (TS) size and relationship with the breeding set (BS) are optimized beforehand. In this study, PAs for the resistance to fall armyworm (FAW) and maize weevil (MW) in a diverse tropical maize panel composed of 341 double haploid and inbred lines were estimated. Both phenotypic best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) and estimators (BLUEs) were predicted using 17 parametric, semi-parametric, and nonparametric algorithms with a 10-fold and 5 repetitions cross-validation strategy. n. For both MW and FAW resistance datasets with an RBTS of 37%, PAs achieved with BLUPs were at least as twice as higher than those realized with BLUEs. The PAs achieved with BLUPs for MW resistance traits: grain weight loss (GWL), adult progeny emergence (AP), and number of affected kernels (AK) varied from 0.66 to 0.82. The PAs were also high for FAW resistance RBTS datasets, varying from 0.694 to 0.714 (for RBTS of 37%) to 0.843 to 0.844 (for RBTS of 85%). The PAs for FAW resistance with PBTS were generally high varying from 0.83 to 0.86, except for one dataset that had PAs ranging from 0.11 to 0.75. GP models showed generally similar predictive abilities for each trait while the TS designation was determinant. There was a highly positive correlation (R=0.92***) between TS size and PAs for the RBTS approach while, for the PBTS, these parameters were highly negatively correlated (R=-0.44***), indicating the importance of the degree of kinship between the TS and the BS with the smallest TS (31%) achieving the highest PAs (0.86). This study paves the way towards the use of GS for maize resistance to insect pests in sub-Saharan Africa en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Cape Coast en_US
dc.subject Prediction accuracy en_US
dc.subject Mixed linear and Bayesian models en_US
dc.subject Machine learning algorithms en_US
dc.subject Training set size and composition en_US
dc.subject Parametric and nonparametric models en_US
dc.title Genomic prediction of tropical maize resistance to fall armyworm and weevils: genomic selection should focus on effective training set determination en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UCC IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account