dc.contributor.author |
Carson, A.G. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-02-23T13:46:33Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-02-23T13:46:33Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016-06 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
23105496 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4732 |
|
dc.description |
6p:, ill. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Production of the early varieties of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) K. Schum.) is increasing because of their earliness and drought tolerance in the face of a shortening and decreasing rainy season. Weeds were considered as a major constraint on improving yields. To improve weed management in millet, the major weeds have been identified in on-farm surveys as a pre-requisite to identifying appropriate weed control recommendations. Grain yield losses incurred by farmers' weeding practices were found to range from 27 to 36%. Early control of weeds within-the-rows, either by handhoeing or by band application of low rates of atrazine or propazine, increased yields by more than 50% in 1985 and by more than 30% in 1986 over farmers' practice. The band herbicide treatment was, however, more cost-effective and easier-to-accomplish than handweeding of weeds within-the-rows |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
University of Cape Coast |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Survey of annual weeds in pearl millet |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Estimation crop losses |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Yield advantage in early control of weeds within-the-row. |
en_US |
dc.title |
Improving weed management in the draft animal‐based production of early pearl millet in the Gambia |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |