Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Korsah, Sampson
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-13T10:08:13Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-13T10:08:13Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.issn 23105496
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/6743
dc.description 26p:, ill. en_US
dc.description.abstract Several analyses have been proposed for the “inherent complement erbs” (ICVs) of the Kwa languages. In this paper, I propose that given the morphosyntactic and semantic properties of both the erb and its complement, it makes sense to treat such erbs like light erbs (Butt 2010), with a more functional role. Following Langer (2005), I argue that the erb only c-selects its “inherent complement”(IC). e IC is thus only a syntactic argument but not a semantic argument of its erb. Accordingly, I base-generate the ICV in Little v (Hale and Keyser 1993), di erent from lexical erbs which are base-generated in (Big) V.is structural representation is not only conceptually motivated, in the sense that the erb is semantically weak, but also, that empirically, the focus properties of an ICV construction suggest that the IC incorporates into a phonetically empty V en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Cape Coast en_US
dc.title On inherent complement verbs in Kwa en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UCC IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account