University of Cape Coast Institutional Repository

Comparison between microscopic and rapid test assay in the detection of malaria parasite infection in patient attending some hospitals in Sokoto Nigeria

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ibrahim, Garba
dc.contributor.author Imam, Umar Asiya
dc.contributor.author Mohammed, Ganau Ahmed
dc.contributor.author Omowale, Raji Mudasiru Iyanda
dc.contributor.author Abdullahi, Fana Sani
dc.contributor.author Aliyu, Shinkafi Sa’adatu
dc.contributor.author Ademola, Kazeem
dc.date.accessioned 2021-06-23T11:31:56Z
dc.date.available 2021-06-23T11:31:56Z
dc.date.issued 2020-06-09
dc.identifier.issn 23105496
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5509
dc.description 5p:, ill. en_US
dc.description.abstract Malaria is a serious public health problem, this study was aimed at comparing Microscopy and Rapid Diagnostics test in malaria parasite detection in patients in some hospitals in Sokoto, Nigeria. Blood Samples were collected by venipuncture and dispensed into EDTA bottle. Thick blood films were made by adding few drops of anticoagulated blood on a clean glass slides and emulsifying to coin size using a spreader and allowed to air-dry and stained with 10% Geimsa stain for 10 minutes, allowed to air-dry and examined using ×100 objective to confirm the presence of malaria parasites. Of the 100 patients screened, 37% and 24% were positive for malaria using Carestart and SD-Bioline, while 53% were malaria positive by microscopy. Prevalence of malaria parasite by sex was 53.6% and 52.3% in females and males. Malaria prevalence by age was highest among patients aged 11-20, while the lowest prevalence was observed in patients aged 51-60 years. Based on occupation, the prevalence of malaria was highest among unemployed patients 58.5%, followed by 22.6% prevalence of malaria among business men and women. No significant difference was observed in malaria infection by sex, age and occupations P<0.05. The sensitivity and specificity of Carestart and SD-Bioline screening kits were 54.7% and 82.6%, 34.6 and 87.2%. The predictive positive value of Carestart was 78.4% while its negative predictive value was 61.3% in contrast to SD-Bioline with 75% and 54.7% as the positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Rapid diagnostic test are suitable alternatives to microscopy particularly in resources limited rural areas en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Cape Coast en_US
dc.subject Comparison en_US
dc.subject Microscopic en_US
dc.subject Rapid Test en_US
dc.subject Malaria en_US
dc.subject Sokoto en_US
dc.title Comparison between microscopic and rapid test assay in the detection of malaria parasite infection in patient attending some hospitals in Sokoto Nigeria en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UCC IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account